EU’s 2040 Climate Target: Can Carbon Credits Bridge the Emissions Gap?

The European Union has laid out a bold new climate vision: reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by the year 2040, compared to 1990 levels. This proposal, announced in July 2025, represents a crucial milestone in the EU’s long-term goal of becoming climate neutral by 2050. But central to this ambitious plan is a controversial feature — the allowance of carbon credits from abroad. The key question now is: can carbon credits help the EU meet its target, or will they weaken climate efforts at home?

A Landmark Climate Commitment

The 2040 target builds on the EU’s current trajectory, which includes cutting emissions by at least 55% by 2030. It reflects growing scientific consensus that deeper cuts are needed to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. The European Commission, in presenting this roadmap, highlighted that the target is grounded in both climate science and economic feasibility.

The proposal also outlines steps for a "just transition," ensuring that all sectors and communities, especially the most vulnerable, can adapt to the low-carbon shift.

Introducing Carbon Credit Flexibility

For the first time in EU climate strategy, the 2040 plan includes a clause allowing countries to use international carbon credits for up to 3% of their emissions reductions. These credits would come from verified climate projects in developing countries, such as reforestation or clean energy installations.

The rationale behind this approach is to offer some flexibility to member states that may face higher costs in cutting emissions, particularly in industries that are harder to decarbonize.

Support and Skepticism

Reactions to the carbon credit proposal are mixed. Some policymakers and industry groups welcome the flexibility, arguing it can ease economic pressures while still supporting global emission cuts. They say it encourages international cooperation and accelerates investment in sustainable development beyond EU borders.

However, environmental groups and climate scientists have raised red flags. They worry that reliance on offsets could lead to weaker action within Europe, allowing countries to "buy their way out" instead of making tough but necessary changes at home. There's also concern about the quality and accountability of carbon credit systems, which have faced criticism in the past for overestimating impact or lacking transparency.

Guardrails and Oversight

To address these concerns, the EU promises strict criteria for acceptable credits. Projects must be measurable, additional (i.e., not already planned), and in line with the Paris Agreement’s rules. Credits should also be traceable and subject to independent verification to ensure real climate benefits.

This cautious approach reflects a broader shift toward strengthening the environmental integrity of global carbon markets — especially under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, which governs international carbon trading.

Looking Ahead

The next step for the proposal is negotiation among EU member states and the European Parliament. If adopted, the 2040 target will guide the bloc’s climate policies for the next 15 years and shape its contributions to international climate efforts.

Ultimately, the success of this strategy will depend not only on how the carbon credits are used, but on whether they complement — rather than replace — strong action at home. The EU’s challenge lies in proving that flexibility and climate ambition can work hand in hand.

Want to buy good quality carbon credits? Visit Hestiya Marketplace.