What Buyers Actually Ask For in a Carbon Credit Procurement Request for Proposal
I. Introduction
Corporate carbon-credit procurement is rapidly evolving, with companies increasingly using structured Request for Proposals (RFPs) to ensure transparency, comparability, and quality in their offset purchases. As voluntary carbon markets expand toward a potential US$100 billion opportunity by 2030, structured procurement has become essential for managing integrity and risk 1,3
This shift is driven by the surge in Net Zero, Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) commitments, and more rigorous ESG disclosure requirements. Thousands of global companies now have science-based climate targets, making carbon credits an important tool for addressing residual emissions that cannot yet be eliminated internally 2,3. At the same time, ESG frameworks require transparent and auditable reporting of emissions and offsets4
With rising scrutiny and accusations of “greenwashing,” quality assurance, rigorous due diligence, and full project transparency have become non-negotiable. Buyers now expect verified methodologies, independent audits, registry data, and evidence of additionality, permanence, and community impact2,3 In this environment, Hestiya plays a critical role. It provides companies with high-integrity vetted projects, standardized documentation, automated reporting, and compliance-ready data, reducing procurement complexity and enabling confident climate action.
This article explores what buyers actually ask for in a carbon-credit procurement RFP, the hidden expectations behind the process, and how organizations like Hestiya help companies navigate this evolving landscape.
II. Why Companies Issue Carbon Credit RFPs
Companies issue carbon-credit procurement RFPs to ensure they are purchasing high-quality, additional, and independently verified credits that genuinely contribute to climate impact. As scrutiny increases from regulators, investors, and the public, organizations must avoid any perception of greenwashing, which is why they demand complete documentation, including methodology reports, verification audits, registry records, and proof of additionality.
RFPs also help companies secure competitive pricing and reliable supply, especially when procuring multi-year volumes or diversified project portfolios. Because carbon procurement affects risk, compliance, disclosures, and reputation, it requires tight collaboration between procurement, sustainability, and legal teams. A standardized RFP process ensures each internal function can evaluate quality, price, integrity, and contractual safeguards consistently.4-6
This is where Hestiya adds clear value. Hestiya provides vetted, pre-verified carbon projects that meet high-integrity standards, reducing the burden of due diligence for corporate buyers. Through standardized project data packs, including MRV data, verification documents, SDG impact summaries, and registry evidence, Hestiya makes it easier to compare suppliers and evaluate quality objectively. By offering clarity, traceability, and automated reporting, Hestiya significantly reduces internal effort and helps companies procure credits with confidence and transparency.
III. Structure of a Typical Carbon Credit Procurement RFP
A typical carbon-credit procurement Request for Proposal (RFP) follows a structured format designed to help organizations evaluate suppliers consistently and transparently. It usually begins with the organisation background, outlining the company’s climate goals, emission profile, and expectations from prospective partners. This is followed by the procurement objectives, which clarify whether the organization seeks spot purchases, multi-year offtakes, specific project types, or certain impact criteria such as SDG alignment or nature-based solutions.
The scope of work defines the volume of credits, project categories, vintages, geographies, and reporting requirements. Next, the RFP specifies supplier requirements, detailing qualifications, due-diligence expectations, verification standards, and documentation that sellers must provide. Clear submission guidelines ensure all proposals follow a consistent structure, making comparison easier across multiple suppliers.
The evaluation criteria, often a weighted scoring model, typically consider credit integrity, pricing, verification, impact, technological transparency, and supplier credibility. Contracting terms outline legal expectations, delivery conditions (ex-ante or ex-post credits), ownership warranties, and payment structures. Finally, the timelines segment lays out deadlines for submission, clarification rounds, shortlisting, and final selection.
This is where Hestiya strengthens the process. Hestiya provides ready-to-use project documents that align with common RFP formats, significantly reducing administrative work for both buyers and suppliers. Its lifecycle impact reporting, registry-verified data, and standardized documentation give procurement teams a complete, audit-ready package. By ensuring supplier submissions are consistent, thorough, and compliance-aligned from the start, Hestiya helps organizations run faster, smoother, and more reliable procurement cycles.
IV. What Buyers Actually Ask For in a Carbon Credit RFP
When corporate buyers evaluate carbon-credit suppliers through a Request for Proposal (RFP), they typically demand a comprehensive package of documentation, clarity, and guarantees across multiple dimensions , from project details to risk mitigation, impact, and transparency. Below is a deep dive into the most common asks, and how a trusted intermediary like Hestiya can help address them.
1. Detailed Project Information
Buyers expect clarity about the project type (e.g. reforestation, renewable energy, cookstove, etc.), geography, additionality, and long-term carbon removal or avoidance. They also look for assurances about permanence (i.e. that carbon stays sequestered or avoided for decades) and measures to prevent leakage (emissions simply shifting elsewhere).
How Hestiya helps: By providing transparent, structured data templates with project descriptions, geolocation, and lifecycle-risk evaluation. Where available, Hestiya may also integrate satellite, sensor, or field-level validation to strengthen confidence that carbon reductions are real and durable.
2. Verification & Accreditation Evidence
Buyers typically require credits to be issued under recognised standards (for example, via programmes such as Verra’s VCS or Gold Standard), with third-party validation/verification (VVB) reports, methodology documentation, and registry listings.7,9
How Hestiya helps: It ensures all projects undergo rigorous due diligence upfront. Buyers receive a “verification pack” containing methodology summaries, audit reports, registry-level proof, and certification data , making evaluation easier and more reliable.
3. Proof of Integrity and Risk Mitigation
Given rising market scrutiny over quality, buyers want assurances around integrity: that a credit is additional, permanent, free from double-counting, and aligned with emerging global benchmarks such as the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM)’s Core Carbon Principles (CCPs).8
How Hestiya helps: By performing independent risk scoring (e.g., permanence risk, leakage risk, baseline credibility) using third-party data. It can provide dashboards that showcase risk mitigation measures, permanence buffers or insurance, and overall project integrity , helping buyers make defensible procurement decisions.
4. Commercial Information
Just like any procurement, price, vintage, supply availability, and contract models matter. Buyers typically request price per tonne, available volume (spot and forward), corporate-offtake terms, payment schedule, and delivery conditions. Good practice warns against picking only the cheapest credits , exceptionally low prices often signal poor quality.4,6
How Hestiya helps: By offering supply forecasts over multiple years and helping buyers compare pricing across comparable project types. This enables transparent evaluation of cost vs quality and ensures supply assurance before contract commitment.
5. Risk & Governance Evidence
Buyers often ask for proof of project ownership rights, legal warranties (against double-counting, reversal, etc.), and a history of monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV). Projects must guarantee that credits are legally valid, unique, and traceable.6,7
How Hestiya helps: By enforcing transparency and conducting legal checks before credits are offered. It ensures that all documentation , including registry entries, title, and MRV history , is available and auditable, reducing governance risk for buyers.
6. Community & SDG Impact
Beyond carbon reductions, many buyers look for co-benefits , social, biodiversity or sustainable development outcomes, aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These may include community livelihoods, health, biodiversity restoration, or ecosystem services.10
How Hestiya helps: By mapping SDG-aligned impacts for each project and creating visual impact summaries (social and environmental), backed by field data or third-party assessments. This strengthens buyers’ ESG narratives and reporting.
7. Technology & Data Transparency
Buyers increasingly value projects that provide data transparency , digital MRV, dashboards, registry traceability, even blockchain-based traceability for ownership and retirement.12
How Hestiya helps: By offering end-to-end traceability through digital MRV integrations, project dashboards with geospatial data, photos, monitoring indicators, and lifecycle tracking. This provides buyers clear, real-time visibility into credit status and performance.
8. Supplier Background & Credentials
Buyers expect clarity about who the supplier/project developer is, their track record, previous clients, scale, methodology experience, and reliability. Smaller developers often struggle to present polished, RFP-ready documentation. 13
How Hestiya helps developers: By standardizing submissions into an RFP-ready format regardless of scale , enabling small or emerging developers to compete alongside larger providers. This levels the playing field and helps buyers evaluate all offers fairly.
V. Hidden Expectations Buyers Rarely State Explicitly
Beyond the formal requirements listed in an RFP, corporate buyers often carry a set of unspoken expectations that significantly influence which suppliers ultimately win. One of these is the need for developers who can help educate internal stakeholders, including procurement, sustainability, finance, and legal teams, so everyone understands the project’s climate value, risks, and long-term benefits. Buyers prefer partners who can simplify complex carbon methodologies and provide clear, jargon-free explanations that make internal approvals smoother and faster.
They also increasingly expect suppliers to deliver compliance-ready documentation, aligned with evolving standards and disclosure frameworks. With regulatory scrutiny rising and ESG reporting becoming more sophisticated, companies want partners who proactively anticipate documentation needs rather than reacting only when asked.
How Hestiya meets these hidden expectations:
Hestiya creates storytelling-ready project summaries that translate technical data into clear narratives for internal audiences.
It offers workshops, knowledge sessions, and webinars tailored for internal teams, helping them understand project integrity, risks, benefits, and regulatory context.
Hestiya ensures that projects align with emerging global standards such as IC-VCM’s Core Carbon Principles (CCPs), CORSIA eligibility criteria, and SBTi guidance, giving buyers confidence that future compliance requirements are already addressed.
These value-adds often become decisive in RFP evaluations, even when not explicitly stated.
VI. How Buyers Evaluate Responses
When assessing carbon-credit RFP responses, corporate buyers typically rely on a structured scoring matrix to ensure fairness, consistency, and transparency across all suppliers. The largest weightage usually goes to Project Quality (30–40%), which includes additionality, permanence, leakage mitigation, and overall environmental integrity. Next is Price (20–25%), where buyers assess cost-effectiveness while screening out suspiciously low prices that often indicate low-quality credits.
Verification Integrity (15–20%) evaluates whether the project follows recognised standards (Verra, Gold Standard, ACR), includes third-party audits, and has registry proof. Supplier Credibility (15–20%) focuses on track record, governance, past delivery reliability, and client references. Lastly, Reporting & Technology (10–15%) examines transparency tools such as digital MRV, dashboards, geospatial monitoring, and traceability systems.
Despite a strong structure, many submissions fail due to missing documentation, lack of proof of additionality, incomplete verification files, or unrealistic pricing that raises integrity concerns. These gaps create hesitation for procurement, sustainability, and legal teams, often eliminating suppliers before deeper evaluation even begins.14
How Hestiya improves evaluation success:
Hestiya ensures all project documentation is complete, verified, and audit-ready, significantly reducing the risk of disqualification.
It provides standardised, comparable data across multiple projects, making evaluation simpler for buyers who need apples-to-apples comparisons.
As a trusted intermediary, Hestiya bridges information gaps between developers and corporate buyers, improving clarity, reducing ambiguity, and increasing the likelihood that high-quality projects score well across all criteria.
This structured support leads to stronger, more confident procurement decisions.
VII. What Makes a Winning Supplier
In carbon-credit procurement, winning suppliers consistently demonstrate a combination of transparency, high-quality data, and operational reliability. Buyers are drawn to suppliers who offer strong impact reporting, including clear evidence of carbon benefits, co-benefits, and alignment with SDGs. Competitive pricing remains important but is rarely the sole determinant, buyers increasingly prioritize credits that come with a clear MRV trail, demonstrating robust monitoring, reporting, and verification. Long-term reliability is equally critical, especially for multi-year offtake agreements where volume consistency and delivery assurance matter.15
Example Scenarios
Consider a cookstove project that submits a complete, data-rich proposal backed by Hestiya’s digital MRV tools. With strong evidence of emission reductions, health benefits, and community impact, supported by transparent datasets, this project scores highly on quality, verification, and impact, ultimately winning the RFP.
By contrast, a REDD+ developer may lose out despite having potential if their documentation is vague, lacks verification clarity, or doesn’t adequately demonstrate permanence and leakage control. Hestiya’s scoring and risk analysis quickly flag these issues, making it difficult for evaluators to justify selection.
How Hestiya Helps Suppliers Win
Hestiya equips suppliers, big and small, with the tools they need to compete effectively.
Standardised documentation ensures consistency and completeness.
Due diligence packages provide verification summaries, registry proof, and risk insights.
Storytelling-ready project summaries help suppliers communicate impact clearly and convincingly.
Integrations with registries and monitoring platforms strengthen traceability and transparency.
With these advantages, suppliers can present credible, polished, and evaluation-ready submissions that stand out in competitive RFP processes.
VIII. Trends Shaping Future Carbon Credit RFPs
As the voluntary carbon market evolves, the nature of carbon-credit procurement is rapidly changing. One of the most significant shifts is the rise of digital MRV, the use of satellite imagery, remote sensors, drones, and AI to measure and verify carbon impact with unprecedented accuracy. This trend is improving transparency, reducing verification costs, and enabling continuous monitoring rather than periodic audits.
Another emerging trend is the move toward portfolio-based procurement16. Instead of sourcing credits from a single project, buyers increasingly prefer diversified portfolios that balance risk, geography, project type, and co-benefits. This also aligns with internal ESG frameworks that require a more holistic climate impact strategy.
Additionally, RFPs are beginning to emphasize long-term offtake agreements, particularly as companies set multi-year Net Zero targets and want stable, predictable supply. This shift coincides with higher regulatory scrutiny, with global initiatives such as IC-VCM, CORSIA, and new national guidelines pushing companies to demonstrate quality, integrity, and compliance across all credits purchased.
Nature-based solutions are also gaining strong traction, driven by biodiversity concerns, ecosystem restoration priorities, and investor preference for projects with measurable social and environmental co-benefits.
Hestiya’s Role in These Future Trends
Hestiya is positioned to support buyers and suppliers as these trends accelerate by:
Offering digital MRV, geospatial traceability, and continuous monitoring.
Enabling multi-year procurement workflows and supply planning.
Helping buyers stay compliant with emerging global standards.
Providing insured, risk-scored, high-integrity projects that meet future-proof quality thresholds.
These capabilities make Hestiya a strategic partner in the next generation of carbon-credit procurement.
IX. Sample RFP Checklist for Buyers
Sample RFP Checklist for Buyers
A well-structured carbon-credit RFP requires buyers to evaluate multiple dimensions of project quality, integrity, and supplier capability.14-16 The following checklist serves as a practical, easy-to-use guide for ensuring all critical aspects are covered:
Project type & quality: Nature-based, energy, cookstoves, engineered removals; clarity on additionality, permanence, and leakage.
Verification: Validation/verification reports, accredited standards (Verra, Gold Standard, ACR).
Vintage & certification: Year of issuance, registry listing, retirement documentation.
SDG alignment: Co-benefits, community impact, biodiversity outcomes.
Risk assessment: Permanence risk, leakage risk, baseline credibility, double-counting safeguards.
Price & supply plan: Cost per tonne, available volumes, multi-year commitments.
Reporting mechanisms: Monitoring frequency, impact reporting format, audit readiness.
Tech integration: Digital MRV, dashboards, satellite data, traceability tools.
Developer credibility: Track record, governance, delivery history, client references.
Hestiya’s Value
Hestiya provides a standardized project evaluation pack covering all the above checkpoints, saving buyers weeks of internal work and ensuring every procurement decision is backed by clear, comparable, and audit-ready data.
X. Conclusion
Carbon credit procurement is maturing rapidly, driven by rising climate commitments, evolving global standards, and greater scrutiny over project integrity. As a result, RFP processes are becoming far more rigorous, data-driven, and transparent, requiring suppliers to provide robust evidence of impact, verification, and long-term credibility. Buyers today want clear documentation, traceability, and integrity, and suppliers who deliver complete, audit-ready information consistently win more opportunities.
In this landscape, Hestiya plays a pivotal role, bridging the gap between what buyers demand and what suppliers can provide. By offering high-integrity projects, structured data packs, digital monitoring, and procurement-ready documentation, Hestiya helps companies make confident, compliant, and future-proof decisions.
Ultimately, the future of carbon credit procurement will be defined by trust, transparency, and technology, and Hestiya is helping shape that future by raising the standard for quality, clarity, and integrity across the market.
References
Abatable. “Core Carbon Principles Explained: Understanding ICVCM’s Integrity Framework.” Abatable, 2023, https://www.abatable.com/blog/core-carbon-principles.
Anaxee Digital Runners. “Carbon Credits: Meaning, Benefits & Opportunities.” Anaxee, 2023, https://www.anaxee.com/carbon-credits.
Beyond Alliance. “Carbon Market Developers: Challenges and Opportunities.” Beyond Alliance, 2023, https://www.beyondalliance.org.
CEEW (Council on Energy, Environment and Water). “ESG Disclosure Landscape in India.” CEEW, 2023, https://www.ceew.in.
CarbonBetter. “Ensuring Carbon Credit Quality: Additionality, Permanence, and Impact.” CarbonBetter, 2022, https://www.carbonbetter.com.
Deloitte. “Voluntary Carbon Markets: Outlook and Opportunities.” Deloitte Insights, 2023, https://www2.deloitte.com.
Gold Standard. “Gold Standard for the Global Goals.” Gold Standard Foundation, https://www.goldstandard.org.
ICVCM (Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market). “Core Carbon Principles.” ICVCM, 2023, https://www.icvcm.org.
Institute for Global Change. “The Future of Carbon Markets and Digital MRV.” Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, 2023, https://www.institute.global.
OrenNow. “Carbon Transparency Through Blockchain and Digital MRV.” OrenNow, 2023, https://www.orennow.com.
Regreener. “Are Cheap Carbon Credits High Quality?” Regreener, 2023, https://regreener.com.
SBTi (Science Based Targets initiative). “Companies Taking Action.” SBTi, 2023, https://sciencebasedtargets.org.
TraceX. “How to Avoid Greenwashing in Carbon Markets.” TraceX Technologies, 2023, https://www.tracextech.com.
Verra. “Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) Program.” Verra, https://verra.org.
Wikipedia. “Carbon Credit.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_credit.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why do companies use RFPs for carbon credit procurement?
Companies use RFPs to standardize evaluation, ensure quality, avoid greenwashing, secure competitive pricing, and reduce compliance and reputational risks.
2. What makes a carbon credit “high quality”?
High-quality credits demonstrate clear additionality, permanence, minimal leakage, third-party verification, transparent monitoring data, and measurable community or biodiversity benefits.
3. What documentation do buyers typically request in a carbon credit RFP?
Buyers seek project descriptions, verification reports, registry listings, MRV data, risk assessments, pricing details, SDG impact summaries, and supplier credentials.
4. Why is verification so important in evaluating carbon credits?
Verification ensures that emission reductions or removals are real, measurable, and independently audited, reducing risks of invalid or overclaimed credits.
5. What are the biggest reasons suppliers fail RFP evaluations?
Common failures include missing documentation, no proof of additionality, unclear verification, unrealistic pricing, weak MRV evidence, and vague project explanations.
